Friday, June 20, 2008

Israeli Military Exercise Seen as Warning to Iran

The Israeli military conducted a massive military exercise in the eastern Mediterranean. The exercise included about 100 aircraft and, mid-air refueling. Analysts are speculating that the exercise is a warning both to Iran and the US that Israel is prepared to use force. Bloomberg

Unfortunately, I cannot see any other solution to Iran's nuclear threat short of a coup.


A wide-ranging Israeli military exercise in the eastern Mediterranean was likely aimed at warning both Iran and the U.S. about the possibility of a strike against Iranian nuclear facilities, a U.S. analyst said.

``It's very hard to think of any other enemies Israel has that would require such a massive use of forces or an attack waged at such a distance,'' said Michael O'Hanlon, a foreign- policy analyst at Washington's Brookings Institution.
....
At the United Nations, Russia's envoy cautioned that even the threat of military action might damage a diplomatic effort aimed at persuading Iran to limit its nuclear work.

``If things happen like threats of force and unilateral sanctions outside the framework of the Security Council, it is distracting from the negotiating process,'' Ambassador Vitaly Churkin told reporters. ``A military move would have devastating consequences for the prospect of resolving the Iranian nuclear issue, for the region and internationally.''

O'Hanlon said the exercise may have been designed to send two simultaneous messages: one to the Iranians that a strike could be made unless they rein in their nuclear activities, and another to the U.S. about the possibility of an attack.

`Used to It'

``They want to get us used to it, or at least not be totally surprised by it,'' O'Hanlon said. ``They want to be able to say they gave us warning. And they want to dissuade Iran as well. It's also battlefield training. It's all these things simultaneously.''

The New York Times, which first reported on the exercise, said it had a range of 900-miles (1,450-kilometers). The Times quoted unidentified U.S. officials as saying the exercise could be a rehearsal for an attack against the Iranian nuclear plant in Natanz as well as Iran's long-range conventional missiles.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

...I cannot see any other solution to Iran's nuclear threat short of a coup....

And you're exactly right; that is unless the US decides to train and arm those Iranians who are willing to fight the terrorist Mullahcracy.

kyros said...

Ya, and give the revolutionary guards a taste of their own medicine

#1 infidel said...

That would be something to see!
but isn't that what helped start Al Queda? Arming one against the other only to come back at you later .
I don't think they can be "assisted"
let Israel do their thing then support them!I guess you just don't Know!

Anonymous said...

#1 Infidel,
Your comparison is not quite right. The culture and temperament of the Iranian people is very different from the Pashtuns.

I'll put it another way, the kind of backstabbing that you refer to is (in my opinion) expected from Muslims. Personally, I never trust Muslims; NEVER! And no Iranian movement or party that abides the slightest ting of Islam deserves any help.

Incidentally, the guys whom the US helped against the Soviets are the ones who formed the Northern Alliance and fought against the Taliban. The Taliban is a creation of Pakistans' intelligence service and al-Qaeda ia a byproduct of Arab presumption of doctrinal and racial supremacy.

Anonymous said...

Kyros,
Actually Irsael could also help train and arm anti-Mullah Iranians.

kyros said...

The Taliban is a creation of Pakistans' intelligence service and al-Qaeda ia a byproduct of Arab presumption of doctrinal and racial supremacy.

This is right on the money.

I'll let anyone train/arm anti-Mullah Iranians as long as they want the Western version of justice and liberty

#1 infidel said...

I understand what you are saying !I am for any means that take these douches out and I'm sure the people of Iran would be better off!It just seems that from past experience ,it bites us in the ass!not a reason to do nothing, but a reason to be cautious and watch our backside !
I also would never trust a Muslim or anyone from the middle east(including who takes over)with scraps of food for my dog!
I just cant see them being trusted,or trustworthy!

#1 infidel said...

I understand what you are saying !I am for any means that take these douches out and I'm sure the people of Iran would be better off!It just seems that from past experience ,it bites us in the ass!not a reason to do nothing, but a reason to be cautious and watch our backside !
I also would never trust a Muslim or anyone from the middle east(including who takes over)with scraps of food for my dog!
I just cant see them being trusted,or trustworthy!

#1 infidel said...

whoops !to much yager!

kyros said...

I certainly don't trust our current 'friends and allies' from the middle east.