Saturday, September 20, 2008

Defemation of Religion Document Rejected by UN

The UN document, defamation of religion, which was put forward by the Organization fo the Islamic Conference was rejected by the UN. The document specificaly mentioned only islam and many critics argued the document would suppress freedom of expression.

This was an attempt by the OIC to make it more difficult to expose the ugly truth about islam and it's violent tendencies. This may be a setback for the OIC but I expect them to come back with another attempt to suppress freedom of expression Human Rights Tribune


It’s a small victory for the defenders of free expression. The concept of defamation of religion promoted by the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) and some African countries did not find favor in the Human Rights Council. It was this theme that concerned all member states this Spring and remains an issue that threatens the follow-up conference on racism (Durban II) which will be held in Geneva next April. If the Council cedes this point, warn certain Western nations ‘it is the end of the Council’s credibility’. On Thursday, Githu Muigai, the Special Rapporteur for contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance, found it was not necessary to promote the sociological concept of defamation of religion but rather to adhere to juridical norms when it comes to inciting racial or religious hatred.

In his report presented yesterday, Githu Muigai repeated the conclusions of his predecessor, Doudou Diène, France’s Ambassador to the UN in Geneva. Speaking for the European Union, Jean-Baptiste Mattéi also applauded the reversal. ‘It is fundamental to make a distinction between criticizing religions and inciting religious hatred. Only the latter … should be banned.’ For France’s Ambassador, freedom of expression is an essential element for democracies. ‘One does not reduce tensions by preventing ideas about religion and belief.’

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Every 'battle won' counts!!!

And though I do not, for one second, think this is not going to come under attack (or even suspect that this 'retreat' could be part of a manipulation), and soon.

Yet, we live in a world where legal precednets DO count - and this one will not go forgotten.