Monday, October 6, 2008

Karzai's Brother Linked to the Herion Trade?

According to informat Hajji Aman Kheri, who was arrested in 2002 for plotting to kill the Afghan Vice President, Afghan President Karzai's brother is linked to herion trafficking. US officials have approached President Karzai several times regarding his brother's links to the herion trade. But Karzai refuses to take any action until the US can produce any concrete evidence against him.

However, no full investigation has taken place because the administration prefers if the matter is dealt with a "hands-off approach". A catch 22 situation, Karzai demands evidence linking his brother to the herion trade but the administration won't conduct an investigation because of the political sensitivity of the matter.

The herion trade in Afghanistan is intimately linked with the taliban and other unsavory characters in the region. In my opinion, in order to win the war in Afghanistan NATO must disrupt the herion trade in order to deprave the taliban of one their primary sources of income.New York Times

WASHINGTON — When Afghan security forces found an enormous

cache of heroin hidden beneath concrete blocks in a tractor-trailer outside Kandahar in 2004, the local Afghan commander quickly impounded the truck and notified his boss.

Before long, the commander, Habibullah Jan, received a telephone call from Ahmed Wali Karzai, the brother of President Hamid Karzai, asking him to release the vehicle and the drugs, Mr. Jan later told American investigators, according to notes from the debriefing obtained by The New York Times. He said he complied after getting a phone call from an aide to President Karzai directing him to release the truck.

Two years later, American and Afghan counternarcotics forces stopped another truck, this time near Kabul, finding more than 110 pounds of heroin. Soon after the seizure, United States investigators told other American officials that they had discovered links between the drug shipment and a bodyguard believed to be an intermediary for Ahmed Wali Karzai, according to a participant in the briefing.
....
But the assertions about him have deeply worried top American officials in Kabul and in Washington. The United States officials fear that perceptions that the Afghan president might be protecting his brother are damaging his credibility and undermining efforts by the United States to buttress his government, which has been under siege from rivals and a Taliban insurgency fueled by drug money, several senior Bush administration officials said. Their concerns have intensified as American troops have been deployed to the country in growing numbers.[...]

The White House says it believes that Ahmed Wali Karzai is involved in drug trafficking, and American officials have repeatedly warned President Karzai that his brother is a political liability, two senior Bush administration officials said in interviews last week.

Numerous reports link Ahmed Wali Karzai to the drug trade, according to current and former officials from the White House, the State Department and the United States Embassy in Afghanistan, who would speak only on the condition of anonymity. In meetings with President Karzai, including a 2006 session with the United States ambassador, the Central Intelligence Agency’s station chief and their British counterparts, American officials have talked about the allegations in hopes that the president might move his brother out of the country, said several people who took part in or were briefed on the talks.

“We thought the concern expressed to Karzai might be enough to get him out of there,” one official said. But President Karzai has resisted, demanding clear-cut evidence of wrongdoing, several officials said. “We don’t have the kind of hard, direct evidence that you could take to get a criminal indictment,” a White House official said.

“That allows Karzai to say, ‘where’s your proof?’ ”
It's hard to present proof when no investigations have taken place.
Neither the Drug Enforcement Administration, which conducts counternarcotics efforts in Afghanistan, nor the fledgling Afghan anti-drug agency
has pursued investigations into the accusations against the president’s brother.

Several American investigators said senior officials at the D.E.A. and the office of the Director of National Intelligence complained to them that the White House favored a hands-off approach toward Ahmed Wali Karzai because of the political delicacy of the matter. But White House officials dispute that, instead citing limited D.E.A. resources in Kandahar and southern Afghanistan and the absence of political will in the Afghan government to go after major drug suspects as the reasons for the lack of an inquiry.

“We invested considerable resources into building Afghan capability to conduct such investigations and consistently encouraged Karzai to take on the big fish and address widespread Afghan suspicions about the link between his brother and narcotics,” said Meghan O’Sullivan, who was the coordinator for Afghanistan and Iraq at the National Security Council until last year.
Read the whole thing.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

It is hideously complicated.
Not just those politics, but others as well. Also economic reality is a big factor.

Ok. Taliban is funded by drug farmers. A better than fair percentage of those farmers don't want to be drug farmers or particularly like the Taliban.
However they need to feed their children somehow and that includes not being shot or blown up.

Farming regular food seems like a good idea, but they don't have proper roads, a distribution chain, or even very many markets in which to sell ordinary farm goods. Dairy and meat products go bad, crops rot while the cart they're in is stuck in the mud.

Naturally it's difficult to get civilian contractors in there to build roads while the Taliban is shooting RPGs at em.

Similarly, it's equally difficult to get regular ordinary farming folk to grow food when it's not profitable and not growing drugs frequently shortens your lifespan.

So it's not terrifically politically profitable to push the 'anti-drug' thing too hard. Locally it can easily be seen as criminalizing people who are just doing what they have to do to survive. Of course it's not politically profitable to have your brother royally screw up by being caught either.
We have to look at this as International politics vs Local politics.
Internationally this is a huge black mark. Locally, I think not so much. Of course in what cities they have left(not from NATO :-P. The whole place has been being carpet bombed repeatedly since well before I was born) there will be talk of corruption and possibly legitimate inquires on where the drug money is going. Which is all right and proper.
Out in the Local real world I think..ehh, not so much caring about this scandal....other than hurting the political anti-drug push. As in - you let him get away with it, but not us? Which hurts NATO more than it does the Afghan government. More often than not it's our side burning down drug plants and telling farmers to grow food...which they can't sell.

I'm not against the anti-drug thing. Strategy to financially starve the enemy.Good. Also financially starves the people. Not good.

I'm an idiot and I offer no solutions. I'm also drunk so ignore me. I think the Surge/Awakening bit that worked in Iraq may work in Afghanistan. There have been glimmers of news that the Awakening bit may be starting in Afghanistan.

All I know is. Iraq, Afghanistan. The US fought for both these people, and then abandoned them after we promised help and friendship. I don't want another black mark on my nation's history.

We made a promise to the Kurds when Saddam went extra-loony. We broke that promise.
We made a promise to the Afghans when the Soviet Union went extra-loony. We broke that promise.
I hope it doesn't happen again.